The Launch of the Worldwide Web (WWW)

When most people think about the Internet, they are actually thinking about the World Wide Web. 

The Web is something that most of us use every day, whether we are searching for information, shopping online, checking social media, or completing school assignments.

Tim Berners Lee is the inventor of the WWW

The World Wide Web was invented by British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee. He developed the idea while working at CERN, a scientific research organization in Switzerland.

During the late 1980s, scientists from around the world were collaborating on projects, but sharing information was not easy.

 Different computers used different systems, making it difficult for researchers to access documents stored on other machines.

Berners-Lee wanted to create a way for information to be connected and easily shared. 

In 1989, he proposed a system that would allow users to move from one document to another by clicking hyperlinks.

To make his idea work, he created several technologies that remain essential to the Web today. 

These included HTML, which is used to build webpages, HTTP, which transfers information between computers, and URLs, which serve as web addresses.

The launch of the World Wide Web occurred in August 1991 when the first website became publicly available. 

The website explained what the World Wide Web was and how people could use it.

Picture showing the reach of the WWW

What started as a tool for scientists quickly became something much bigger.

One of the biggest impacts of the Web was making information more accessible.

Before the Web, finding information often required visiting libraries, purchasing books, or accessing specialized databases. With the Web, people could search for information from almost anywhere.

Communication also changed dramatically.

The Web helped make email, online messaging, websites, discussion forums, video calls, and social media possible. Today, people can communicate with others across the world in seconds.

The business world was transformed as well.

Companies gained the ability to reach customers globally through websites and online stores. Entire industries developed around digital services, online advertising, and e-commerce.

Education has also benefited from the growth of the Web. 

Students can access online articles, research databases, educational videos, and virtual learning platforms. 

The amount of information available to learners is greater than ever before.

Despite its many advantages, the World Wide Web has created challenges.

Students using the WWW

The spread of misinformation has become a major concern. 

False information can travel quickly online and reach large audiences. 

Privacy is another issue because websites and companies often collect personal data from users.

Cybercrime has also increased as more activities move online. Identity theft, scams, and hacking are examples of problems that did not exist on the same scale before the Web became widespread.

Even with these challenges, the World Wide Web remains one of the most influential inventions in human history.

A technology that started as a solution for scientists sharing information grew into a global system that changed communication, education, business, and everyday life. 

More than three decades after its launch, the World Wide Web continues to shape how people connect with one another and access information around the world.

AI Disclosure: I used Microsoft Copilot to help generate a draft of my speech and blog post about the launch of the World Wide Web. I provided the topic and assignment requirements, then reviewed and edited the content before submitting my final work.

Anti-War Voices?

I had never heard of Antiwar.com or The American Conservative until we talked about them in class. Once I started reading them, I couldn't stop thinking about why nobody had ever told me these sites existed.

The U.S. has been at war with Iran since February 28, 2026. 

The Congressional Budget Office says it had cost about $38 billion through August. 

That is a huge number, but honestly, it barely registers for most people my age. It just feels like background noise.

The Antiwar.com logo

Antiwar.com is a nonprofit that pulls together news and opinion about Iran, Yemen, and how much the military is spending. 

The American Conservative caught me off guard. 

It's a conservative magazine, and it runs a daily "Iran War Day" update. 

Its homepage even has a quote from President Trump saying that the people who tried to build nations ended up wrecking more of them than they built.

My honest opinion is that strong antiwar voices are hard to find in mainstream news because the government has so much power over the media. 

I think reporters who push too hard could lose the careers they worked so hard for, so coverage stays safe. That's how I see it, and I know other people would explain it differently.

To be fair, mainstream outlets do report on problems with this war. The AP reported this week that both Democrats and Republicans said a top Pentagon official dodged their questions in a closed briefing. 

But that kind of coverage mostly asks how the war is being run. Antiwar.com and The American Conservative ask whether we should be in it at all, and I hardly ever see that question get real attention anywhere else.

The basis of The American Conservative

I think people look for smaller sites because they want the whole story. 

That makes sense to me, but these sites have their own point of view too, so I don't think reading them means you can stop thinking for yourself.

I don't want anyone to feel lied to or like they're only getting half the story. 

Read the mainstream coverage and the antiwar coverage together, notice what each one leaves out, and make up your own mind. 

I only found these sites because my professor happened to mention them, and nobody should have to rely on that to hear more than one side of a war.

Privacy, Online & Off

We like to think we control what the world knows about us. Then something happens that reminds you just how much you don't.

A few weeks ago, I was talking to my mom about her fitness classes and whether she should start teaching cycle. Nothing was typed, nothing was searched, just a conversation.

Later that day, I opened Instagram and suddenly my feed was full of cycling instructor videos. 

Social Media Privacy

It's honestly a little creepy when that happens.

It's one thing to know, abstractly, that companies collect data on us. It's another thing to have a spoken conversation followed almost instantly by ads that match it word for word. 

Moments like that make it hard not to wonder what else is listening.

It's not just conversations, either. 

Every time I travel for a rowing regatta, my social media feed starts recommending things to do in whatever city I've landed in, before I've even told any app where I am. 

Same with Google: I'll search "restaurants" with zero location details, and it already knows exactly where I'm standing. 

HPU Travel Bus

None of this is a coincidence. It's the product of data mining, location tracking, and behavioral marketing working together, quietly, in the background of everyday life.

What gets me is how normal this has become. 

We've accepted contracts of adhesion, the terms of service nobody actually reads, because using the app matters more in the moment than protecting our information. 

Once we hand our data to a company, the third-party doctrine kicks in: we've basically given up control over what happens to it next.

And it doesn't stop with apps. 

Police departments now use license plate readers that log ordinary people's movements, not just criminals. 

Add in the federal government pulling this information into centralized databases, plus the fact that companies quietly sell them what they can't legally collect themselves, and it starts to feel like privacy is less a right and more a formality.

So, what do we actually do? 

Limit your Location

Honestly, I've started being more intentional: checking app permissions, limiting location access, and thinking twice before I post. 

It won't stop targeted ads from happening after a random conversation with my mom, but it's a start. 

At the very least, we should be asking louder questions about who's collecting our data, how long they keep it, and what it's actually being used for. Because right now, most of us have no idea.

AI Disclosure: I used Microsoft Copilot to help edit this post. 

Eight Values of Free Expressions

The Main points of the eight values of expression

Out of the Eight Values of Free Expression, the one that stuck with me the most is Individual Self-Fulfillment, also called self-actualization.

This idea comes from a legal scholar named C. Edwin Baker, who taught at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and was known as one of the country's leading First Amendment scholars. 

C. Edwin Baker 

In his book Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech, published in 1989, Baker pushed back on the idea that free speech mainly matters because it helps society find truth through debate. Instead, he said speech matters because of what it does for the individual person saying it, tying it to human dignity, agency and autonomy.

 As one summary of his work put it, Baker believed speech is protected not because it produces some collective good, but because of what it's worth to the person expressing it.

I have epilepsy, and for a long time that wasn't something I talked about openly. 

There's a real fear that people will start treating you differently once they know, like you're fragile. So, when I started thinking about what self-fulfillment through speech actually looks like, I didn't have to look far.

 I had already lived it.

Usually, people talk about free speech like it's a delivery system, just a way to hand information from one person to another. Baker flips that. To him, speech is part of how you actually become a person. 

Justice Thurgood Marshall

You don't only use language to describe a self you already understand completely; you use it to figure that self out in the first place. Justice Thurgood Marshall said something similar when he wrote that free expression serves not just the needs of society but the needs of the human spirit, a spirit that demands self-expression as part of developing ideas and a sense of identity. 

That's exactly what happened when I finally talked about my epilepsy out loud instead of keeping it to myself. Saying it plainly made the condition feel like something I owned instead of something I was hiding from.

A while back I found out a girl I knew had just been diagnosed with a different chronic illness. I remembered exactly what that first stretch feels like, the fear, the not knowing what your life looks like now, feeling like nobody around you understands what's going on in your body.

Information about Epilepsy

So, I made myself speak up. I told her about my epilepsy, what it's actually been like living with it, the stuff nobody warns you about and the stuff that actually helps. It wasn't easy, talking about it still doesn't come naturally to me. But I did it anyway, because I knew what it might mean to her.

That moment is Baker's theory in action, as far as I'm concerned. I wasn't trying to win an argument or convince anyone of some bigger truth.

 I was using my voice to put something about myself into the open, and in doing that I ended up giving someone else a little less fear and a little more company. 

That's the part of self-fulfillment I think gets left out of a lot of these discussions. It's not just about expressing who you are, it's about how that expression can end up connecting you to someone else who needed to hear it.

Of all eight values, this is the one that feels the least abstract to me. 

I experience it not as a citizen keeping an eye on government power, but as someone who found out firsthand that saying a hard thing out loud can hand someone else a little bit of strength. Self-fulfillment might not be the loudest value on the list, but it's the one I can actually point to in my own life and say, yeah, I've lived that.

The Supreme Court Reflection

 

The Supreme Court is the most powerful court on earth

Before watching these videos, I thought of the Supreme Court as a distant institution that only appeared in the news when a major decision was announced.

 What surprised me most was learning how much discussion, debate, and tradition goes into every decision long before the public hears about it.

One fact that really stood out to me was that there have only been a little over 100 Supreme Court justices in American history.

Supreme Court Justices 2026

When one justice compared being appointed to the Court to being struck by lightning, it made me realize how rare that opportunity is. 

There are only nine justices at a time, yet their decisions can affect millions of people.

I was also shocked to learn that it can take a justice around three years just to adjust to the workload. From the outside, it is easy to assume that the justices immediately know how to handle everything, but the videos showed that even they need time to grow into the role.

Another thing I did not know was how many cases reach the Court every year.

 Learning that roughly 7,000 cases arrive annually made me appreciate how selective the process is and how much responsibility comes with deciding which cases deserve the Court's attention.

What changed my perspective the most was seeing how the justices interact with one another. 

The tradition of shaking hands before every conference meeting surprised me. 

The Constitution

In a country where disagreement often leads to division, that simple act shows that respect can exist even when people have different opinions.

As a journalism student, I found the oral argument process especially interesting. Lawyers have only 30 minutes to present their case, and the justices use that time to ask difficult questions. 

It reminded me that behind every legal issue are real people and real consequences.

My biggest takeaway is that the Court's power does not come from force.

 It comes from trust.

 After watching these videos, I no longer see the Supreme Court as just a group of judges interpreting a 200-year-old document. 

I see it as an institution that depends on public confidence, thoughtful debate, and the responsibility of the people who serve on it.

AI Disclosure: I used Microsoft Copilot to help organize and refine my notes based on research I have done.

My Top 5 News Sources

 

My odd way of getting news

My top five news sources are in no way fancy, and they're probably not the most accurate lineup you'll ever see. 

But these apps and shows are how I first find out about things, and from there, I start doing my own research. 

Fox News Logo

1. Fox News

My first news source, hands down, was Fox News. It's the only channel my family ever had playing in the house growing up, so naturally, it's where I learned to "go" for news. 

As I got older, though, I started noticing how biased it could be, and that realization pushed me to look elsewhere for a more balanced perspective.

YouTube Logo

2. YouTube

That search for balance led me to YouTube.

 I began following creators who seemed more neutral and who posted videos breaking down specific topics. 

What I liked about this shift was that it gave me room to actually sit with an issue and figure out my own opinion, instead of having one handed to me.

Instagram Logo

3. Instagram 

My third source is one I'll admit is a little more accidental: Instagram. 

Headlines pop up on my feed, and if one catches my eye, that's usually my cue to go dig deeper. 

It's less of a "news source" in the traditional sense and more of a trigger, something that tells me, "Hey, you should probably look into this."

Google Logo

4. Google

Which brings me to source number four: Google. 

Once something catches my attention, Google is where I go to actually research it. I like it because it doesn't hand me one narrative. 

It gives me access to all kinds of different sources, so I can compare perspectives and get a fuller picture instead of relying on a single outlet.

TikTok Logo

5. TikTok

And finally, source five: TikTok.

 I'll be the first to say it's not the most reliable place to get your news. 

But it spreads topics fast, and because so many different people are weighing in with their own takes, you end up seeing a wide range of opinions and outlooks on the same situation, sometimes more than any single "legitimate" outlet would show you.

None of these five sources is something I'd call "the news" on its own.

 They're more like starting points. 

Fox News gave me a baseline, and later, a reason to question that baseline.

 YouTube taught me to slow down and form my own opinions. 

Instagram and TikTok act like alarm bells, letting me know what people are talking about right now. 

And Google is where the actual digging happens.

I think that's probably true for a lot of people my age. 

We don't get our news from one trusted anchor desk anymore. 

We piece it together from a handful of imperfect sources, cross-check when something feels off, and try to land somewhere close to the truth. 

It's messier than how my parents got their news, but in some ways, it forces me to think more critically about what I'm actually reading.